#Mono poly massive native instruments Pc#

PC and Win gives user more freedom and choise, more possible problems and mostly not so sleek design. And you are right, they brought many inventions that pushed world ahead. It works, there is not many products, so it is easier to decide what to buy, ekosystГ©m. There is a layer above it to behave it as CISC. Intel and AMD processors are internally RISC. But it is not Apple technology, Apple just paid to get it done by third party.ДЄpple could have used AMD processors instead Intel, but they decided to use its own processor. Apple users do not mind to pay premium price for best available technology. But it is not because of miraculous CPU architecture of M1, but because of the most advanced chip production proces. But yes, M1 has better (lower) energy consumption than ZEN3. They are not involved in this CPU segment.)ДЄnd AMD mobile ZEN3 outperfprms M1. (If you meant by mobile CPU something for phone/tablet then yes, neither Intel, neither AMD has one. And it is real 15 W, 35W and 65W, not like Intel's values, which may be easily double in reality. AMD has 15 W, 35W and 65W mobile processors. Or at least get a working knowledge of computer history first.ДЄMD has mobile CPUs, and they are superior to current Intels. Since my lot bear the brunt of this, and you donвЂ™t, you may want to not come into threads like these and troll.

#Mono poly massive native instruments mac#

Ryzen was a top secret project, caught intel with its pants down.ДЄppleвЂ™s attitudes make mac life hard from time to time.Д«ut the only effect it has on pc ppl is that apple keep inventing the things youвЂ™ll need in 2 years. With no competition, intel shut down r&d. The processor slowdown happened because AMD could not compete for a few years. The technology for m1 existed, but you will see it copied by intel and amd in the coming months, because they have to.

#Mono poly massive native instruments windows#

Apple has perfected many product genres, windows only exists as a response to apple.

#Mono poly massive native instruments android#

But we donвЂ™t need to talk about that, much like you donвЂ™t really need to have an opinion on products you donвЂ™t use.Д«ut android exists because apple created the template. It sounds like you are not an apple user, and you donвЂ™t need to deal with these problems.ДЄnd it sounds like you donвЂ™t understand why people use apple.ДЄpple is not neccesary for anything, but if you are used to it, windows and android feel like a hot mess.

#Mono poly massive native instruments software#

It has some software problems, but I can live without Massive XвЂ¦ for now.

This switch was pretty badly managed, but my mac was dying, and I was facing bying a very expensive new one that would be only incrementally better.Д«ut I waited and got a dirt cheap mbp m1 instead. That is a whole other market.Д«ut these cheap mobile chips crush the intel desktop chips, so M1 macs deliver incredible value, and lead the marketвЂ¦ in mobile.ДЄpple silicon was a solution to a problem Intel created. вЂњNeeds coolingвЂќ = not mobile.ДЄpple has not released a desktop chip. Intel just survives on their mobile chips.

Amd raced ahead, but their chips are not mobile optimized, their big market is gamers. MacOS was written only for intelвЂ™s propriatary tech. It does not need much cooling.ДЄpple only used intel chips, so they canвЂ™t compare to amd. And because of monopoly, the cost of not maintaining backward compatibility may be transferred to third party SW vendors.Д¬lick to expand. It cuts down the cost to maintain the things. Abadoning old things has one main advantage. I do not think Apple progresses any faster comparing to PC world. But it will be difficult and expensive to deliver several times more CPU power to be competetive to PC world. It is neat to have powerfull computer without cooling or with small cooling.

Power of computers aproximately doubles every 2 years, so in 10 years it is roughly 10x faster, in 20 years 100x faster, in 30 years 1000x faster.ДЄMD Zen 3 CPUs may deliver way, way bigger CPU power than M1. AMD Zen 3 processors would be comparable to M1 (CPU power delivered/energy consumption) if they were manufactured on the same, most advanced, proces.ДЄpple may manufacture on the most advanced (and the most expensive) proces, as the users accept paying premium price even for basic product.Д¬omparing M1 to many years old Intels is pure marketing. It is modern CPU manufactured on the most advanced process. M1 is not miraculous chip that overrules alll. And because of monopoly, the cost of not maintaining backward compatibility may be transferred to third party SW vendors. Click to expand.I do not think Apple progresses any faster comparing to PC world.